Legal Opinion

Reed v. Philpot's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 7, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Stanley

Affirming.

This suit for damages' was filed by the widow and children of Henry Eeed against the administrator of E. C. Philpot’s estate, Joe Spivy, and the sureties on the bond of Philpot, as chief of police of the city of Irvine. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal.

The petition alleges that Eeed was a deputy sheriff of Estill county, and that, while he had one Estes in custody on a charge of transporting and possessing intoxicating liquor, Philpot, while acting in his official capacity, had summoned Spivy to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ash v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rowland's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Taylor v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Walker v. BrantnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  5. Hogg v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McComb v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Stewart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Neely v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. O'Neil Hearn v. Bray's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. DecaturSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API