Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 2005No. CR 04-1084PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This case is an appeal of a circuit court’s denial of postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37 (2005). The constitutional question before us is whether a criminal defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel solely because his nonresident lawyer, who was licensed to practice law in another state, failed to secure pro hac vice admission to the Arkansas court trying his criminal case. We hold that such a circumstance does not constitute a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

Appellant Gregory Fisher was convicted of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. John NovakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. John L. Reese v. Howard Peters, Iii, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. McCraney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Norris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API