Legal Opinion

Amarok v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 6, 1990No. A-3079PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Joseph J. Amarok, Jr., was convicted after pleading no contest to one count of sexual assault in the first degree and one count of burglary in the<first degree. As a third felony offender, Amarok was subject to presumptive terms of twenty-five years for the sexual assault and six years for the burglary. Superior Court Judge Joan M. Katz found three aggravating factors: that Amarok was on parole at the time of the offense, that his victim was particularly vulnerable, and that his conduct was among the most serious in its class. After rejecting Amarok’s request to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. WorthamAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mutschler v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Tookak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  5. Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Napayonak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  2. Magelssen v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. TofelogoAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  5. Malemute v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API