Legal Opinion
Kirk Co. v. Ashcraft
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1984No. 14957PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Plaintiff Kirk Company sued defendant W.R. Ashcraft to recover the purchase price on a contract for the sale of Christmas trees. Defendant counterclaimed for breach of contract, alleging that the trees were not delivered on time and were not of the quality warranted. The jury awarded plaintiff $16,566.41, and found against defendant on his counterclaim.
In this appeal, defendant contends that (1) certain of defendant’s requested jury instructions were erroneously refused; (2) it was reversible error to give Jury Instruction 1; (3) plaintiff’s witness was improperly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Archibeque v. HomrichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Matter of FerrillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Silva v. Albuquerque Assembly & Distribution Freeport Warehouse Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.