United States v. Thirty-Two Barrels of Distilled Spirits
District Court, S.D. Ohio
In rem. Action for forfeiture of distilled spirits. Trial to a jury. The evidence showed the addition of water to the spirits to have a been about a gallon per barrel.
1Opinion of the Court
Swing, D. J.,
(charging jwry.) The 30 barrels of distilled spirits sought to be forfeited in this case were seized by Collector Kennedy, of the fourth Ohio district, as forfeited to the United States for the following causes: First. “That said distilled spirits were in certain casks and packages containing more than five gallons, the said casks and packages not *189having thereon each mark and stamp required hy law,” contrary to section 3289, U. S. Rev. St. Second. Some person then and there carrying on the business of a distiller and wholesale liquor dealer did “omit, neglect, and refuse to have…
2Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. One Package of Distilled SpiritsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1898
- Barceló & Cía., S. en C. v. Sancho BonetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- United States v. Bennett Goldberg, United States of America v. Donald Robert Hamilton, United States of America v. Claude J. Hupp and John W. Reilly, United States of America v. Frank S. Leonard, United States of America v. James D. O'connor, United States of America v. Constantine W. Parzyck and Steven F. Parzyck, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Theodore WisniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Three Packages of Distilled Spirits v. United States ex rel. WesthusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.