Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Blythe v. Trimble

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 4, 1924Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Counsel for respondents earnestly insist that the refusal of the trial court, at the close of the evidence for plaintiff, to permit the relators (defendants in the trial court) to file an amended answer pleading that the plaintiff, administrator of the estate of A.B. Woolston, prior to the trial, had filed his final settlement and had been discharged, was a matter within the sound discretion of the court and not reviewable on appeal. They refer to the statement of the trial court (251 S.W. l.c. 149) in which the learned judge,inter alia, said:

"Therefore the court is in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bassett v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Harrison v. Kansas City Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Brennan v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Lottman v. BarnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Baker v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API