Legal Opinion

Narbona v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 2003No. 3D03-332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

As there is substantial, competent evidence to support the finding that the appellant voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to his employer when he remained away from work longer than his scheduled leave without informing his employer of his status, we affirm the order disqualifying him from receiving unemployment benefits. See e.g., Garcia v. AT & T Communications, Inc., 575 So.2d 730, 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (affirming the finding that appellant was not entitled to unemployment benefits where she requested a six-month leave of absence and was informed that reemploy*227me…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slusher v. STATE DEPT. OF COMMERCEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Kacsir v. ST. UNEMPLOYMENT APP. COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Garcia v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cobo v. Walgreen Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Sanchez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API