Legal Opinion
United States v. Millet
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 14, 2007No. 06-2678, 06-2893PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
In August 2004, Harvey Gooden, a police informant, invited an attorney, Christopher Millet, to participate in a robbery of a drug dealer. Millet, who claimed to be well versed in the art of robbing drug dealers, readily accepted Gooden’s offer. After the robbery, Gooden asked Millet for a gun, purportedly to protect himself from the dealer they had robbed, and after some prodding, Millet obliged. For his actions, Millet was charged with conspira cy to distribute cocaine, attempting to distribute a controlled substance, and knowingly disposing of a firearm to a known…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gary R. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Abraham HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Eliseo ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Villegas-MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Leslie MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. CamposCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.