Berks Broadcasting Co. v. Craumer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
The determinant of this litigation is the provision of the Business Corporation Law of May 5, 1933, P. L. 364, section 701, that a corporation, in computing a surplus from which cash dividends may lawfully be paid, must not include as an asset any unrealized appreciation in the value of its fixed assets. The application of that mandate to the uncontroverted facts in this case compels a reversal of the judgment for defendants which was entered by the court below.
The circumstances underlying the controversy, though intricate in detail, are simple in substance.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southern California Home Builders v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Dealers' Granite Corp. v. FaubionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by11 opinions
- Taylor v. AIA Services Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Loftus v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Beneficial Corp. v. Reading & Southwestern Street Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.