Legal Opinion

Canadian Fish Co. v. McShane

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1908No. 15,048PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Calkins, C.

The plaintiff was a dealer in fish at Minneapolis, and the defendant a commission merchant in Lincoln. In February, 1902, the plaintiff’s manager, being in Lincoln, made an oral agreement with defendant to handle 'frozen fish. It is agreed that the fish were to be invoiced at certain stipulated prices; hut the defendant insists that they were to be consigned to him upon commission, he to have the difference between the invoice price and the amount for which' he should sell the same. - The plaintiff contends that the defendant agreed to purchase the same outright, and that it gave…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Treat v. PriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. McIntosh v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BuckstaffNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crilly v. RuyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Swanson v. MadsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Smoot v. CheckettsUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Jensen v. Lincoln Hail InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Growers Cattle Credit Corp. of Omaha v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API