Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. J. W. Bishop & Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1980No. 817 C.D. 1976Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Mencer:

I respectfully dissent.

The Department of Transportation (PennDOT) has instituted trespass actions against George H. Overmoyer and J. W. Bishop & Company, Inc. (defendants), seeking recovery of damages to bridges, allegedly caused when defendants’ overweight vehicles *385crossed the bridges, causing them to collapse. Presently before this Court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment and motion for judgment on the pleadings. Both motions contend that PennDOT’s claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

The relevant statute of limitations for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API