Legal Opinion

Queens County Savings Bank v. Spinella

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas P. Phelan, J.

Plaintiffs unopposed motion for summary judgment of foreclosure, appointment of a referee to compute, extension of a notice of pendency and other related relief is denied as to extension of the lis pendens and is granted in all other respects.

*223With the exception of a basis for extension of the lis pendens, plaintiff has provided uncontroverted evidence of its entitlement to the relief sought.

Regarding the lis pendens, counsel for plaintiff affirms that it was filed on March 31, 1997 and concedes that it is expired. Pursuant to CPLR 6513 a notice of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of SakowNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Slutsky v. Blooming Grove Inn, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Robbins v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Gallo Bros. Construction, Inc. v. PeccoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Isaias v. FischoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API