Legal Opinion

State v. Sneed

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1989No. 88-415, 88-417PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Following a jury trial in the district court for Douglas County, the defendants, Michael V. Smith and Robert L. Sneed, were found guilty of four counts of receiving stolen property. The cases have been consolidated for briefing and oral argument. Assigned as the single error was the action of the district court in overruling defendants’ motions to suppress physical evidence. We affirm.

In determining the correctness of a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, the Supreme Court will uphold a trial court’s findings of fact unless those findings are clearly wrong. State v. Texel, 230 Neb.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Hunter Keith JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. State v. HodgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. TexelNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GrimesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. GrovesNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. UtterbackNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. FloresNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API