Legal Opinion
A.M., a minor, by and through her parent and legal representative, Nicole Mumma v. TODD MUMMA, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 18, 2026No. 1:22-cv-00548Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 A.M., a minor, by and through her parent Case No. 1:22-cv-00548 JLT SKO and legal representative, Nicole Mumma, 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 13 DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY THE PRELIMINARY 14 v. INJUNCTION 15 TODD MUMMA, et al., (Docs. 50, 51, 56) 16 Defendants. 17 18 A.M. alleges in this action that defendant Todd Mumma is liable under federal and state 19 laws that permit the victims of sexual abuse to seek compensation from their abusers. The matter 20 is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brown v. PlataSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Liu v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Larry Melancon v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.