MATTER OF JOHNSON v. Pataki
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentSmith, J.
Since this action is moot, the appeal should be dismissed and the orders of the Appellate Division and Supreme Court should be vacated. While I believe the merits should not be reached, I address them only because the majority has chosen to do so. In that respect, the issue is not whether a Governor can supersede a District Attorney in a proper case. It is clear that he can. Rather, the issue is whether the Governor properly superseded the District Attorney in this case. I believe that he did not. First, I cannot agree that supersession is proper here without setting forth the limits of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.