Legal Opinion

Seals v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2018No. SD 35080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, P.J.

Felix McGrundy Seals ("Movant") raises three points on appeal in which he charges clear error in the motion court's denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of two claims for ineffective assistance of trial counsel (Points 1 and 2) and one claim for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel (Point 3). Finding merit in Movant's third point, we reverse the motion court's denial of Movant's claim for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, but affirm the order denying relief in all other respects.

Standard of Review and General Principles of Law

This Court reviews the motion court's findings…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. BAUMRUK v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seals v. HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. MICHAEL D. BURNS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Pervis McAllister v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI ex rel. FELIX M. SEALS, Relator v. THE HONORABLE CALVIN HOLDEN, THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. SEAN M. WOLFMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API