Legal Opinion

Faillace v. Village of Mamaroneck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

Manning, J.:

The plaintiffs, who are general contractors, brought this action against the defendant village, for which they were building a sewage disposal plant. In their complaint two causes of action were set forth: First, for damages suffered by the plaintiffs because the defendant, as they claim, unlawfully ousted the plaintiffs and prevented them from completing their work under a contract which they had with the village. The second cause of action is. for damages claimed for the alleged unlawful act of the defendant in taking possession of plaintiffs’ material and equipment which were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Graf v. . CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Mahoney v. Oxford Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. James Ackroyd & Sons v. ProctorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API