Legal Opinion

Clinton Forbel Thinn v. J. Williams

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 24, 2021No. 2:21-cv-06403Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLINTON FORBEL THINN, ) NO. CV 21-6403-JLS(E) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) 13 ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 14 ) WITH LEAVE TO AMEND J. WILLIAMS, et al., ) 15 ) 16 Defendants. ) ______________________________ ______) 17 18 19 For the reasons discussed below, the First Amended Complaint is dismissed with leave 20 to amend. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 21 BACKGROUND 22 On August 9, 2021, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis, filed this civil 23 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API