Legal Opinion

Medved v. Saul

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 29, 2020No. 0:19-cv-02434Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Neil M., Case No. 19-CV-02434 (ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Neil M.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 17) (“Motion”) and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Andrew Saul’s (“Defendant”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 21) (“Cross-Motion”). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this case seeking judicial review of a final decision by Defendant denying his application for disability insurance benefits. For the reasons…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Geneva Goff v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Marcus Hensley v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API