Legal Opinion

Stendal v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1897No. Nos. 10,356—(230)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, a child of tender years, caused by the negligence of the defendant. Briefly stated, the allegations of the complaint are that the defendant, being the owner of a lot adjacent to a public street in a densely populated part of the ci-ty of St. Paul, made a deep excavation upon it, by quarrying stone, which filled with standing water which was luring and enticing to young children, who were, to the knowledge of defendant, accustomed to go *280there to play; that he left it unguarded, and in such condition as to be a menace…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Kefee v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Rolseth v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Edgington ex rel. Meyer v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Stendal v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Kayser v. LindellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Beinhorn v. GriswoldMontana Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API