Legal Opinion · Concurrence

J.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 2002No. 2D97-1551Published

1Concurrence

NORTHCUTT, Judge,

Specially concurring.

I concur in my colleagues’ majority opinion with one reservation. In J.P. v. State, 832 So.2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), on which today’s ruling is based, I wrote a concurring opinion stressing that in my view it is an open question whether the city’s interest in protecting children’s welfare can ever justify a blanket prohibition against them leaving their homes during specified hours. Thus, as I did in that case, I agree that this ordinance is unconstitutional for at least the reasons described in the J.P. majority opinion.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002