Legal Opinion

Huber v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.

The suit was brought to recover upon a policy of life insurance; the defense was that the policy had lapsed. A question of fact having appeared, the case was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant of no cause of action. It was admitted, however, that the plaintiff was entitled to the return of a payment of fifty-three dollars and ninety cents which had been made to the defendant after the lapse of the policy; accordingly a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for that amount was entered by consent and plaintiff awarded judgment therefor, but without costs.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. KannAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  2. Sauner v. Vohwinkle, New York County Courts1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API