Huber v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
The suit was brought to recover upon a policy of life insurance; the defense was that the policy had lapsed. A question of fact having appeared, the case was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant of no cause of action. It was admitted, however, that the plaintiff was entitled to the return of a payment of fifty-three dollars and ninety cents which had been made to the defendant after the lapse of the policy; accordingly a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for that amount was entered by consent and plaintiff awarded judgment therefor, but without costs.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hill v. KannAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
- Sauner v. Vohwinkle, New York County Courts1925