Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Johnson v. McDonald

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided July 5, 2016No. 10-1785(E)Published

1Concurrence

KASOLD, Judge,

separate statement:

I concur that Mr. Johnson was a prevailing party and that the Secretary was not substantially justified during the administrative processing of Mr. Johnson’s claim. In support of that decision, I note that although our precedential caselaw may not have explicitly addressed the full scope of the Secretary’s regulation on extraschedu-lar consideration, a fair reading of our caselaw would have cautioned the Secretary against any attempt to inexplicably ignore the plain wording of his regulation. Not only did Judge Steinberg’s concurrence in Brambley v. Principi…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Brambley v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
  5. Robert J. Kiddey v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API