People ex rel. Suburban Investment Co. v. Miller
New York Supreme Court
Cebtiobabi to review assessment.
1Opinion of the CourtJaycox, J.
The relator brings this proceeding to review the assessment of its lands for the year 1910. It is admitted, and also testified to by the clerk of the town, who was also clerk of the board of assessors, that a large part of the property of the relator was entered upon the assessment rolls after the 1st day of August, 1910. The clerk testifies that books 1, 2 and 3, to his best recollection, were completed before the first day 'of August., This raises the question as to the right of the assessors to add property to the assessment roll after that date. Section 36 of the Tax Law (Laws of 1909,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Warren v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People Ex Rel. Chamberlain v. ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Overing v. FooteCommission of Appeals · 1875
- People ex rel. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co. v. NeffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- People ex rel. New York Central v. KenoNew York Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vanadium Corp. of America v. Board of Assessors of NiagaraNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Thompson Ely Realty Co. v. FitzNew York Supreme Court · 1911