Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Escalante

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1990No. 16689, 16720 and 16744Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

I would not darken the lamp of justice by recognizing a de minimis violation as being jurisdictional or prejudicial error. Rather, I would that the lamp of common sense illuminate the proceedings below. There is the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. Truly, the spirit of the law, but not the letter of the law, was fulfilled.

There is no doubt that South Dakota is guilty of sloppy procedure. However, Appellants have been treated fundamentally fair. All state’s attorneys of this state should, in the future, make absolutely sure that a deputy has taken an oath, signed his contract, been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. PizzaroNew York Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API