Herring v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Demuebeb to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.
The defendants hay e separately demurred to the plaintiff’s complaint and have urged several grounds of demurrer. But from an examination of the complaint I do not think it necessary to go beyond the principal ground assigned, which is, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The proper disposition of that question requires that I should state, with some detail, much of the pleading to which objection is made.
The plaintiff is the owner, of thirty-six bonds, of the nominal value of $500 each, issued by the Atlantic and Great Western Railroad Company,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Ocean National Bank v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Verplanck v. Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Geery v. . GeeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Dunlevy v. . TallmadgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- McCartney v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Andrew v. VanderbiltNew York Supreme Court · 1885
- Herring v. N. Y. Lake ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1887