Legal Opinion

Herring v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demuebeb to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

The defendants hay e separately demurred to the plaintiff’s complaint and have urged several grounds of demurrer. But from an examination of the complaint I do not think it necessary to go beyond the principal ground assigned, which is, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The proper disposition of that question requires that I should state, with some detail, much of the pleading to which objection is made.

The plaintiff is the owner, of thirty-six bonds, of the nominal value of $500 each, issued by the Atlantic and Great Western Railroad Company,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Ocean National Bank v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Verplanck v. Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Geery v. . GeeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Dunlevy v. . TallmadgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. McCartney v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrew v. VanderbiltNew York Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Herring v. N. Y. Lake ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API