Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1966No. A-13840PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, defendant below, was charged by information in two cases in the district court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma, with the crime of uttering and publishing a forged instrument. Defendant was duly arraigned on November 30, 1964 in the district court of said county, appearing in person and by his counsel, Malcolm Baucum, and entered his plea of not guilty in each case, and waived trial by jury. The two cases came on for trial before the court on January 25, 1965 and by agreement were consolidated.

Thereupon it was stipulated by the county attorney and the attorney…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API