Legal Opinion
Dong v. Smithsonian Institution
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 1996No. Civil Action 94-628 (GK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
KESSLER, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, Margaret Dong, brings this action against her employer, the Smithsonian Institution, for damages caused by Defendant’s alleged breach of its statutory obligations regarding the collection of employment information under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(2) (1994).
I. Findings of Fact
Plaintiff has been employed by the Hirsh-horn Museum and Culture Garden since 1985. She began as a clerk-typist and was promoted to assistant registrar for outgoing loans. She is technically classified under the civil service…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Catherine Cotton v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, the Smithsonian InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Russell T. Johnson v. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Richard L. Waters v. Richard ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Cotton v. AdamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Dong v. Smithsonian InstitutionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Margaret Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, Hirshhorn Museum & Sculpture GardenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Thompson v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Velikonja v. MuellerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.