Legal Opinion
Shaver v. Operating Engineers Local 428 Pension Trust Fund
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2003No. 01-16922PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RICHARD S. ARNOLD; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.
OPINION
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge:
The Operating Engineers Union, Local 428, has an ERISA pension fund for its members’ benefit. The plaintiffs, William Shaver and William Dereschuk, a participant and beneficiary of the plan, respectively, had concerns about the management of the fund. Eventually, they filed a two-count complaint against the trustees and administrator of the ERISA benefit plan, the defendants. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants failed to turn over, pursuant to statutory requirements, certain financial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zimmerman v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- James Morrison v. Michael Mahoney, Warden, Montana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Alonso v. Blackstone Financial Group LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Arakaki v. LingleDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
- Hatter v. DyerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.