Legal Opinion

Steele v. Humphrey

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1948No. 232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This is petitioner’s second application for writ of habeas corpus in this district.1 The present petition raises one new ground not heretofore presented and determined and which is therefore being considered herein.2 Using his own language, his contention is, “The petitioner bases his complaint on the fact that he was discharged from the United States Army while serving a sentence adjudged by general courts-martial, that one day after the issue of discharge your petitioner was interned in a United States Federal Penitentiary; interned therein by the military…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hironimus v. DurantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. O'MALLEY v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Ex Parte SteeleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Lee v. Paul J. Madigan, Warden, Federal Penitentiary, Alcatraz, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Smith v. HumphreyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Prentiss v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API