Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Clarence B.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1974No. Crim. 23370PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

On June 23 and July 18, 1972, two petitions were filed in the juvenile court alleging that defendant, Clarence B., came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The two petitions were consolidated and after a hearing, paragraphs II, IV, and VI of the second petition, alleging two violations of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 2 (rape) and one violation of Penal Code section 288a (oral copulation), were found to be true. The first petition and the remaining paragraphs of the second petition were dismissed. Defendant was declared a ward of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. Richard W.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. Abdul Y.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Fare v. Michael R.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. Eugene R.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. Javier A.California Court of Appeal · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API