Legal Opinion

MCKENZIE R. ALLEN, Petitioner/Respondent v. BAILEY L. SEELY

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2021No. SD36891Published

1Opinion of the Court

MCKENZIE R. ALLEN, ) ) Petitioner/Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD36891 ) Filed: November 22, 2021 BAILEY L. SEELY, ) ) Respondent/Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY Honorable Jerry L. Holcomb, Judge AFFIRMED Bailey L. Seely (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s “Judgment of Modification” in two points relied on: (1) that the trial court entered its judgment without giving the parties proper notice and opportunity to be heard; and (2) that the trial court failed to make statutory best interest findings as to Mother’s relocation. Finding no merit to either point, we affirm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Richard E. Ivie, Jimmie R. Ivie, LaDonna Small, and Bernard Ivie v. Arnold L. Smith and Sidney B. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Paul L. Pasternak v. Denise M. PasternakSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Clayton v. SarrattMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Stowe v. SpenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API