Pike Industries, Inc. v. Woodward
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The appellants, Brian Woodward and other abutters of Pike Industries, Inc.’s (Pike) asphalt plant, appeal a ruling of the Superior Court (Tucker, J.) reversing the decision of the Town of Madbury Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) that Pike had discontinued its nonconforming use of its plant. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The following facts are drawn from the administrative record. Beginning prior to 1960, Pike has continuously operated an asphalt production plant in Madbury. In the mid-1960s, the town promulgated an ordinance that zoned the area surrounding the plant for residential…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Fox v. Town of GreenlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Lawlor v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- McKenzie v. Town of Eaton Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- In re Goffstown Education Support StaffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Town of Carroll v. RinesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013