Legal Opinion

Marley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2000No. 49A02-9908-CR-617Published

1Opinion of the Court

729 N.E.2d 1011 (2000)

Julie MARLEY, Appellant-Defendant,

v.

STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff.

No. 49A02-9908-CR-617.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

June 8, 2000.

John Pinnow, Greenwood, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.

Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General of Indiana, Randi E. Froug, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Julie Marley (hereinafter, "Marley") appeals the trial court's interlocutory order concerning her presentation of certain evidence.

We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Whether the trial court erroneously ordered Marley to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Burks v. BolerjackIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Crawford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. United States v. Richard Dale TalbottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API