Brocato v. United Railways & Electric Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Stanton, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.
The action in this case was brought by the appellant to recover for personal injuries resulting, as it is alleged, from a fall while riding in a car of the appellee.
At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony a prayer was granted by the Court, at the instance of the defendant, withdrawing the case from the jury for a want of legally sufficient evidence entitling the plaintiff to recover.
The plaintiff, Josephine .Brocato, with three others, Joseph Sabatina, Nick Defatta and her son, Samuel Brocato, hoarded a car of the defendant company at the corner of Garrison and Piedmont avenues. Joseph…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Railways & Electric Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
- Martin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Callis v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
- Sauvan v. Citizens' Electric Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Hagerstown & Frederick Railway Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kaufman v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Mass Transit Administration v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Wiggins v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Baur v. CalicCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Przyborowski v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.