Legal Opinion
Norfleet v. Deme Enterprise, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 20, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, *500J.), entered on or about January 25, 2008, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, affirmed, without costs.
We reject defendants’ argument that plaintiff’s chiropractor failed to satisfactorily address their radiologist’s conclusions relating to his opinion that plaintiffs condition is due to preexisting, degenerative changes, where plaintiffs chiropractor specifically opined that plaintiffs injuries may contribute to “future degenerative processes” and that the trauma sustained in the accident “was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Gorden v. TibulcioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Jimenez v. RojasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- DeLeon v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Hammett v. Diaz-FriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henry v. PegueroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Byong Yol Yi v. CanelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Farrington v. Go On Time Car ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Polanco v. Greenstein & Milbauer, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017