Swindle v. State

CATES, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to verdict, the court below adjudged Swindle guilty of burglary in the second degree, or grand larceny, or buying, receiving, etc., stolen goods. A single sentence of ten years imprisonment was pronounced.

I

Whether or not the disjunctive verdict was void for ambiguity we need not decide. First, the single sentence obviates any question such as that presented in Wildman v. State, 42 Ala.App. 357, 165 So.2d 396.

Second, defense counsel interposed no objection to the reception of the verdicf. See Thomas v. State, 2 Md.App. 645, 236 A.2d 747.

In Baldwin v. State, 213…