McGriff v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Because the trial court improperly held that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), do not apply to Appellant’s case, we reverse.
On November 13, 1988, Appellant was convicted of second-degree murder with a firearm, armed burglary with a firearm, and armed robbery with a firearm. Appellant was sentenced as an habitual felony offender to an upward departure sentence of life imprisonment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Isaac v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Galindez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. McGriffSupreme Court of Florida · 2011