Legal Opinion

Zuckerman v. Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1996No. 95-1444PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Zuckerman v. Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., 646 So.2d 187 (Fla.1994), quashing Donald S. Zuckerman, P.A. v. Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., 629 So.2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), that the disability insurance settlement receivable by the judgment debtor was exempt from garnishment under section 222.18, Florida Statutes (1991), plainly required the return not only of the principal sum which had been wrongfully garnished but of the interest on that amount as well. See Hill v. First Nat’l Bank, 79 Fla. 391, 84 So. 190 (1920); Mann v. Thompson, 118 So.2d 112…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Mann v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Zuckerman v. HOFRICHTER & QUIAT, PASupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. DONALD S. ZUCKERMAN v. Hofrichter & QuiatDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hofrichter v. Zuckerman & VendittiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Moreno v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API