Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Walters

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 27, 1996No. 95-1202; Crim.App. No. 9300196Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

The Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision so heavily relied on by the lead opinion to resolve this appeal was based on a credibility determination by that appellate court. 42 MJ 760, 763 (1995). It chose defense counsel’s affidavits over appellant’s. I do not agree that this is the proper way to proceed when post-trial disputes as to facts are presented. See United States v. Dykes, 38 MJ 270 (CMA 1993); United States v. McCarthy, 2 MJ 26, 28 n. 2 (CMA 1976). Moreover, I do not agree that the decision of this Court in United States v. Lewis, 42 MJ 1, 6 (1995), permits such a procedure. I would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. WaltersArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API