United States v. Walters
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentSullivan, Judge
The Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision so heavily relied on by the lead opinion to resolve this appeal was based on a credibility determination by that appellate court. 42 MJ 760, 763 (1995). It chose defense counsel’s affidavits over appellant’s. I do not agree that this is the proper way to proceed when post-trial disputes as to facts are presented. See United States v. Dykes, 38 MJ 270 (CMA 1993); United States v. McCarthy, 2 MJ 26, 28 n. 2 (CMA 1976). Moreover, I do not agree that the decision of this Court in United States v. Lewis, 42 MJ 1, 6 (1995), permits such a procedure. I would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. WaltersArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995