Gandy v. State

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the violation of the Tick Eradication Law, in the county court of Smith County, and punished by a fine of $25.

It appears from the record that appellant made a motion to quash the complaint and information, on the ground that the same charged no offense, for the reason that the Act of the Thirty-fifth Legislature, Chapter 60, known as the “Tick Eradication Law,” is invalid as to the penalty, because it prescribed two penalties for the same offense. We do not think the offenses mentioned in Sections 15 and 22, in said Act, are necessarily the same,…