Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Kraco, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 1983No. AI-429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

426 So.2d 1120 (1983)

Luis ACOSTA, Appellant,

v.

KRACO, INC., and Corporate Group Services, Appellees.

No. AI-429.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 3, 1983.

Rehearing Denied March 1, 1983.

Richard A. Sadow of Sadow, Lynne & Gonzalez, North Miami, for appellant.

Steven Kronenberg of Adams, Kelley, Kronenberg & Rutledge, Miami, for appellees.

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a compensation order denying wage loss benefits on the ground that the claimant is more than 65 years old. The claimant contends that § 440.15(3)(b)3.d., Fla. Stat. (1979), requiring the termination…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robbins v. Rophie Shoes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sasso v. Ram Property ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Morrow v. Amcon Concrete, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Izquierdo v. Volkswagen InteramericanaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Stahl v. TENET HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. McRae v. Jerry's CatererDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API