Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1948No. 13579PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

The Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company in 1944 was assessed employment taxes under the Carriers Taxing Act, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Code, § 1500 et seq., 45 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq., on the workers who had performed services in 1940 under an employment relationship with the Shipley Company which had contracted to perform such services for the Railway Co. On denial of its claim for refund, the Railway Co. sued in the District Court to recover the taxes so paid and obtained a judgment. See Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Reynolds, D.C. Minn., 68 F.Supp.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelm, Collector of Internal Revenue v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. KelmDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
  3. Reynolds v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API