Legal Opinion
Mahar v. Fichte
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Fricano, J.), entered December 4, 2001, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion seeking to strike defendant’s answer based on defendant’s failure to provide a verified bill of particulars responding to item Nos. 4 through 13.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting in part plaintiff’s motion and striking defendant’s answer unless defendant, within 30 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, serves a verified bill of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foote v. RajadhyaxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Santilli v. CHP, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Connelly v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kaire v. Trump Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Rubino v. Albany Medical Center HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BURGIO, ROBERT M. v. CITY OF LOCKPORTAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Burgio v. City of LockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011