Legal Opinion

Duckworth v. State Administration Board of Election Laws

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2003No. 02-1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge GOODWIN joined.

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question of first impression before our court of whether a plaintiff can sustain his attack on the constitutionality of congressional district apportionment by alleging that the challenged districts are bizarrely drawn.

Appellant, Robert P. Duckworth, sued various Maryland agencies and officials, appellees, alleging that their enforcement of the state’s 2002 congressional reapportionment statute, Laws of Maryland Chapter 340,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. LamoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. League of Women Voters v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Duckworth v. State Administration Board Of Election LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API