Goldsmith v. Stern
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Marcus T. Goldsmith against Julius Stern and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.
The action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendants. The plaintiff claims that he was induced to make sales which occurred in October and November, 1902, by a wrong statement alleged to have been falsely and fraudulently made in July, 1902, by the defendants for the purpose of securing credit. The plaintiff succeeded in the court below, and defendants appeal. The appellants contend that the statement made in July was for the purpose of a sale made at the time, and was not operative as to future sales. The evidence of the plaintiff, however, is to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bradley v. Seaboard National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Levy v. AbramsohnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sharp Electronics Corp. v. ShawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Farmers' Savings Bank v. JamesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916