Legal Opinion

Teague v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1978No. 7724SC1011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The defendants group 139 exceptions and assignments of error to the admission of testimony by plaintiff’s witness, John Vaughn, a surveyor, in their first argument, contending that the surveyor was permitted to state his opinions and conclusions. We have examined all of the exceptions and find them to be without merit. On direct examination surveyor Vaughn, found by the court to be an expert in his field, described each line and corner of his survey made from the description of the 173-acre tract in the deed to the plaintiff. He testified that some of the tree marks and corner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Crosland-Cullen Company v. CroslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Dugger v. . McKessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Gillispie Ex Rel. Troxler v. Thomasville Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kabatnik v. Westminster Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API