Legal Opinion

Christman v. Weil

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 3, 2001No. [No. 3, October Term, 1950.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment against him entered by the trial court sitting without a jury, for damages to the appellee’s gasoline tank truck. The sole question involved is whether the appellee is guilty of contributory negligence either as a matter of law, or in fact.

Appellant was driving his car along a public highway in Frederick County. He stopped just off the highway to permit Mrs. Huber, an employee, to take the wheel. A tractor-trailer milk truck was behind him, and, after going over a slight grade, or knoll, the driver of the milk truck saw the change of drivers, and slowed down…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sieland v. GalloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Mitchell v. DowdyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Isenhour v. McGranighanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Jones v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brehm v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Dean v. RedmilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Zanetti Bus Lines, Inc. v. LoganWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bernardi v. RoedelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Yellow Cab Co. v. BondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API