Legal Opinion

Sigmund v. Newspaper Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for Rent, on a sealed lease. Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendants. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Horton

The declaration in this case contains but one count, and that is special upon the written lease thereto attached. It is for the demise of Store Ho. 86 Fifth avenue, Chicago. Among other things it is provided in said lease as follows :

“ It is agreed that the party of the first part (appellee) shall divide the two stores eighty-four (81) and eighty-six (86) Fifth avenue, by a suitable partition, and will repair and decorate the interior of said store number eighty-six (86) Fifth avenue.” Said lease is a sealed instrument," and is signed and sealed by appellant. The other signature and seals are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago Attachment Co. v. Davis Sewing Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Creighton v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Donohue v. Chicago Bank Note Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  4. Blake v. KurrusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  5. O'Leary v. DelaneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. New York Central R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Bowman v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Holden v. GulstromOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Adolph Spear & Co. v. Empire Lace & Embroidery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API