Legal Opinion

State v. Dahrens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 2004No. C981048972; A108383PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the fourth degree and reckless endangerment. He assigns error to the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on self-defense and defense of property. We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on self-defense and reverse.

A defense to a criminal charge must be presented to a jury through a jury instruction “if there is any evidence from which the jurors could infer that the required elements of the defense are present.” State v. Shelley, 110 Or App 225, 228, 821 P2d 1111 (1991). “We review the evidence in the light…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. ShelleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Yen Lin WanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. StryeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. Mosqueda-Rivera-BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API